LawFarm- Advice & Lawyers Online

Share on facebook
Share on linkedin

Criminal Law

The branch of law that deals with crimes is known as criminal law. It forbids behaviour that is deemed to pose a threat to, be detrimental to, or otherwise pose a risk to the possessions, health, safety, and moral well-being of others, including oneself. The majority of criminal law is established by statute, meaning that a legislature enacts the laws. People who break these laws are punished and rehabilitated under criminal law.

Criminal law differs from civil law, which places more of a focus on conflict resolution and victim compensation than on punishment or rehabilitation, and varies depending on the jurisdiction.

Criminal procedure is a codified official action that certifies the fact of a crime’s committed and approves the offender’s punishment or rehabilitative care.

Criminal law is just one of the tools used by organised societies to safeguard individuals’ rights and guarantee the survival of the group. In addition, there are the moral principles taught by families, schools, and religion; workplace and factory rules; laws of civil life enforced by regular police powers; and the penalties accessible through tort claims. It can be challenging to establish a precise line separating criminal law from tort law, but generally speaking, one can argue that a crime is seen as an offence against the public, even when the actual victim may be an individual.

Criminal law stands out due to the very severe penalties or repercussions for breaking its norms. [8] Criminal ingredients make up every crime. In some jurisdictions, the death penalty may be applied to the most egregious offences. Although these penalties are outlawed in many parts of the world, physical or corporal punishments like flogging or caning may be used. Depending on the jurisdiction, someone may be detained in prison or a jail under a variety of circumstances. One person may be held captive.

Five objectives are widely accepted for enforcement of the criminal law by punishments: retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation and restoration. Jurisdictions differ on the value to be placed on each.

  • Retribution – Criminals should receive some sort of punishment. The most well-known objective is this one. Criminal law will “balance the scales” by placing criminals at some unfavourable disadvantage since they have unfairly harmed or taken advantage of others. People submit to the law in order to receive the right not to be murdered, and if they break the law, they lose the rights that the law has given them. As a result, a murderer may be put to death by himself. “Righting the balance” is a concept that is related to this notion.
  • Individual deterrence is directed at the particular offender in a deterrent strategy. The goal is to impose a punishment severe enough to deter the offender from future criminal activity. Overall society is the target of general deterrence. Other people are deterred from committing those actions by the punishment meted out to those who commit them.
  • Incapacitation: Merely intended to keep offenders out of society so that the general people is protected from their misconduct. These days, prison sentences are frequently used to achieve this. Both the death penalty and exile have achieved this goal.
  • The goal of rehabilitation is to make a criminal into a contributing member of society. Its main objective is to persuade the offender that their actions were wrong in order to stop them from committing new offences.
  • Restoration: This theory of punishment emphasises the victim. The intention is to make good on any harm the criminal has caused the victim by using state power. For instance, if someone embezzles money, they must give back the money that was obtained illegally. Restoration, which refers to putting the victim back in the position they were in prior to the injury, is frequently linked with other major criminal justice objectives.

Many laws are enforced by threat of criminal punishment, and the range of the punishment varies with the jurisdiction. The scope of criminal law is too vast to catalogue intelligently. Nevertheless, the following are some of the more typical aspects of criminal law.

  • Actus reus: The physical component of a crime is called Actus Reus. In civil cases, the plaintiff or victim must have suffered harm as a result of the accused’s actions or inactions. There can be no crime and no cause of action for damages without a guilty act. However, an act by itself does not constitute a crime; rather, the crime is made up of the act itself and the person’s intention, if the conduct is unlawful. When determining guilt or demonstrating a reasonable doubt about the defendant’s intentions, the facts of the case are sometimes also taken into account.
  • Mens rea: Mens rea is crucial in determining whether or not an act is criminally responsible. Mens rea shows that the accused had a definite intention to commit the offence for which he is being prosecuted. The accused must be shown to have committed the offence with full knowledge of what they were doing and with malice toward the victim in mind. Mens rea, which requires the defendant to have been aware of the consequences of their conduct for a civil liability to exist, is also employed in some civil lawsuits, although typically, the Actus Reus takes precedence in cases of civil liability. An Act may be voluntary or involuntary, and the facts of the situation define the guilt. Even though the act of driving while intoxicated was accidental, the person is nonetheless guilty of the offence if he chooses to drink before doing so and unintentionally harms others. However, if an otherwise healthy individual has a heart attack and unintentionally hurts someone else while driving, he is not responsible and is not guilty of the crime.
  • Strict liability: Strict responsibility is defined as criminal or civil liability regardless of the defendant’s mens rea or intent. It is not always necessary to have a precise intent to commit a crime, and the standard of guilt may be lowered or lowered further. Showing that a defendant acted negligently rather than purposefully or recklessly, for instance, can be sufficient. It may not be essential to establish intent in cases of absolute culpability where the forbidden act is not involved. Generally speaking, crimes must involve an intentional act, and “intent” is a requirement to establish that a crime occurred. A “strict responsibility offence” is a contradiction in terms.

Criminal law is intended to secure individual rights, the vulnerable against the strong, the law-abiding against the lawless, and the peaceful against the violent. The state has established a set of standards for behaviour, as well as penalties for breaking them, tools for enforcing those penalties, and protocols to safeguard that equipment.

By Pranjal